Food integrity · Evidence page

Project SHIELD India

A proposed food-fraud and supply-chain integrity programme addressing relabelling, counterfeit packaging, expiry-date manipulation, traceability gaps and weaknesses in recalls.

Public problem

Why this initiative is being developed

Product standards cannot protect consumers if the identity, batch history, packaging or expiry information of food is falsified. Prevention therefore requires traceability, intelligence-led inspection, rapid recall capability and accountability across the chain.

Evidence boundary: the sources below establish the legal, institutional or risk context. The proposed framework, phases and outcomes are Nitish Jindal's independent policy assessment and are not presented as government decisions.

Primary evidence

Authoritative sources supporting the problem definition

01

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India

Food Recall

FSSAI's official recall framework and statutory context for unsafe food.

Open primary source →
02

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India

Labelling and Display Regulations

Official requirements relevant to product identity, declarations and consumer information.

Open primary source →
03

Food Safety and Standards Authority of India

Food testing resources

Official information on recognised food-testing methods and rapid testing resources.

Open primary source →

Institutional ownership

Authorities and delivery partners

  • FSSAI for national standards, recall rules and coordination
  • State food-safety departments for inspection and enforcement
  • Customs and other competent agencies for import and cross-border risks
  • Food businesses and logistics operators for traceability, records and recall execution

Implementation

Proposed sequence

  1. Map priority fraud types, commodities and supply-chain vulnerabilities
  2. Define minimum interoperable batch and event records
  3. Pilot risk scoring, authentication checks and coordinated recalls
  4. Scale with enforcement analytics, public alerts and annual integrity reporting

Measurable outcomes

How progress should be judged

  • Faster identification of affected batches
  • Reduced opportunity for relabelling and re-entry of recalled goods
  • Clear recall ownership and consumer communication
  • Comparable enforcement and fraud indicators across jurisdictions

Safeguards

Constraints that must govern design

  • Proportionate obligations for small businesses
  • Due process before public attribution
  • Secure handling of enforcement intelligence
  • Independent verification of technology claims before procurement

Version: Evidence page 1.0 · Last materially reviewed 2026-08-02 · No official adoption or endorsement is claimed.

Return to all initiatives

Start a serious conversation

Discuss Project SHIELD India

Use the enquiry route for evidence corrections, institutional consultation, research collaboration or implementation discussion.

Contact Nitish Jindal