National resilience · Evidence page

Project SURAKSHA India

A proposed national civil-defence and resilience mission examining warning systems, protective infrastructure, public training, emergency continuity and coordination across levels of government.

Public problem

Why this initiative is being developed

India has a statutory civil-defence foundation, but a legal mandate becomes a dependable public capability only when local risks are mapped, warnings reach people, protective options are defined, volunteers are trained and readiness is repeatedly exercised.

Evidence boundary: the sources below establish the legal, institutional or risk context. The proposed framework, phases and outcomes are Nitish Jindal's independent policy assessment and are not presented as government decisions.

Primary evidence

Authoritative sources supporting the problem definition

01

India Code

The Civil Defence Act, 1968

The statutory foundation for civil-defence measures in India.

Open primary source →
02

National Disaster Management Authority

Civil Defence guidance — Part I

Official guidance on civil-defence organisation, roles and preparedness.

Open primary source →
03

Ministry of Home Affairs

Lok Sabha answer on civil-defence mechanisms, 3 February 2026

Current parliamentary evidence on the institutional position across States and Union Territories.

Open primary source →

Institutional ownership

Authorities and delivery partners

  • Ministry of Home Affairs for national standards and coordination
  • State and Union Territory governments for implementation and training
  • District authorities for risk maps, public instructions and exercises
  • Local bodies, emergency services, health systems and utilities for operational delivery

Implementation

Proposed sequence

  1. Baseline: legal, institutional and district-capability audit
  2. Design: minimum standards, risk tiers and funding principles
  3. Pilot: representative border, metropolitan, industrial and coastal districts
  4. Scale: phased national adoption with recurring exercises and public reporting

Measurable outcomes

How progress should be judged

  • Measured warning reach and response time
  • Defined protective options in priority risk zones
  • Trained and identifiable community capability
  • Auditable corrective actions after every exercise

Safeguards

Constraints that must govern design

  • No public disclosure of sensitive infrastructure
  • Accessibility standards for children, older people and persons with disabilities
  • Transparent procurement and clear command responsibility
  • Volunteer roles that complement, not replace, professional emergency services

Version: Evidence page 1.0 · Last materially reviewed 2026-08-02 · No official adoption or endorsement is claimed.

Return to all initiatives

Start a serious conversation

Discuss Project SURAKSHA India

Use the enquiry route for evidence corrections, institutional consultation, research collaboration or implementation discussion.

Contact Nitish Jindal